white balancing raw files

because of technical issues i had to dive with out my strobes today, using only my new olympus E520. (technical issues: i am getting old and keep forgetting things. this time i forgot my tray so i couldnt attach my two strobes to the housing)

i was shooting RAW+jpg. the jpg was at the highest quality setting (probably a bit unnecessary if you have the raw file as well). i was using auto white balance, auto iso and shutter priority on all ambient light photos. i tried some quick white-balancing using picasa and the "pick neutral color" tool on both the jpgs and raw files. i clicked at the same region for the white balancing in both the jpg and raw file (usually a patch of sand or bare rock in the photo).

some samples of post-white-balancing. 

the original (jpg, but the raw is very similar looking, not as sharp and with some more highlights), 

resulting image after manually post-whitebalancing the jpg file (left) or the raw file (right)

  

same deal here: 

white balance done on the jpg versus raw

  

and some more examples of applying white balancing on the raw files (original versus white-balanced):

  

there is a bit of a difference, even with very basic quick fixes (which is all i have time and skill to do). white-balancing raw seems also easier: in the jpg files if you click some seemingly neutral looking color which happens not to be a good area to use, then the photo is all messed up. so some more clicks might be required to get a good result. the raw file is more forgiving it seems. In most of the case in these pictures i used parts of the sand for white balaning (avoiding the highlights on the sand, so i picked the more dark sandy regions). In the photos with the diver (greg) i tried both the sand and the buckles on the tank (good thing he is using steel ones and not black plastic...). the sand was not as good in that particular shot. All photos were taken at bare island east side (left), at roughly  10-12m depth, with seriously crappy weather (rainy windy cloudy cold). visibility was very bad, maybe 4-5m at some points, but maybe a bit more in the last photo above. max auto iso was set to 800 which was not needed, should be ok at 400.

All photos available at my flickr page